
If you’re like me, you’ve long lamented the fact that, goshdarnit, the US does not own enough of Citi. But I have good news. Your prayers have been answered!
Way back when Citi was getting bailout money to the tune of $45, the government got for its trouble preferred shares that it could convert to common stock any old time it wanted to. Of course, it would never do such a thing, because it would severely dilute existing common stock, wiping out billions in wealth. Except now it is mulling doing just such a thing, especially since the bank’s stock has dipped below the $2 mark (after $55 less than two years ago) and it’s not like you can dilute anything meaningfully beyond that. What, now my $2 stock is now worth $1? Yeah, I’m already out on the ledge, it’s not like this is going to make my day that much worse.
But for those of you living in eternal fear of the other dreaded n-word, this might not constitute nationalization:
There’s no universal agreement on what constitutes nationalization of a bank. In the U.K., the government already owns 43% of Lloyds Banking Group PLC, and last week moved to increase its ownership of Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC to 70% from 58%. Those two banks have been classified as “public-sector entities,” and as much as £1.5 trillion ($2.136 trillion) of their liabilities have been moved over to the country’s balance sheet.
So see, Citi would remain as independent as RBS. That’s something, right?
Talks of not-nationalization lead, of course, directly to questions about what’s to become of everyone’s favorite dwarf CEO (seriously, does anyone know how tall he is?) because one would expect that if you drive your company into the arms of a gruff-but-caring federal government, you’ve pretty well failed as a corporate leader. I mean, this is really a lot like if you married a successful pop singer and helped her down a path of self-destruction so inescapable it culminates with her shaving her head and having to have her father take over her affairs, except at this point one wonders if K-Fed could have done much worse. Bandit was threatened with his job if the company had to come back for more money, and would have been gone last November if there were anyone out there qualified who wanted the job, which is something like what Citi itself ran into when replacing Chuck Prince and someone at the board meeting, possibly drunk, slurred aloud, “Hey, what about that guy from that hedge fund that we bought a few months ago that’s been losing money like nobody’s business?”
Maybe this year’s American Idol runner-up will be offered the job.


CB // Feb 23, 2009 at 10:42 am
geithner in a bandit mask. heh heh heh. xclnt!
John Mazzotta // Feb 23, 2009 at 1:20 pm
If the preferred stock is converted to common stock, the US gov’t should own about 80% of the company. If the nation owns 80% of Citi, how is that not nationalizing? Oh, I know, we’ll buy it at twice what it’s worth! Then we’ll only own 40%! Genius!
Jason // Feb 23, 2009 at 1:58 pm
It’s not nationalization because we’re not calling it nationalization. See how this works?
Yeah, neither do I.
Lolo, Esq // Feb 23, 2009 at 7:00 pm
now that’s some funny shit
Evil Weezil // Feb 23, 2009 at 8:56 pm
Earman strikes again!
RobT // Feb 23, 2009 at 10:47 pm
Geithner joined the Justice League?
Perhaps there could be a masked league of lol Superfriends?
1134 // Feb 24, 2009 at 6:53 am
NEW YORK, NY – Wall Street executive Robert Rubin has successfully sued himself for $8 million.
The suit cited Rubin’s managerial incompetence while serving as CEO of Citigroup, a leading banking organization now sharing much of the blame for the financial crisis.
“Mr. Rubin wildly underpriced risk and speculated recklessly,” Mr. Rubin said in a statement. “Much of our current turmoil stems from this kind of behavior, and it’s time I started sending a message to fat cats like me.”
The language of the settlement legitimizes Mr. Rubin’s grievances with Mr. Rubin, and the seven-figure payoff is a clear signal that those responsible for the crisis will be forced to pay themselves for their misdeeds.
When asked if he felt justice had been served, Mr. Rubin cautioned that more widespread litigation might be called for in a general sense, but affirmed that the settlement was satisfactory to him for the time being.
“This goes a long way towards reestablishing the equilibrium,” he said. “Mr. Rubin made serious mistakes, and it’s time that Mr. Rubin answered for them, ideally to Mr. Rubin.”
Mr. Rubin added, “That’s what makes this country great.”
HT Weekly World News.
'mouse // Feb 24, 2009 at 12:11 pm
Is it too late to short Citibank? I can’t get into the business banking website today. That’s usually a sign of the end-times.
Dave So // Mar 3, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Fred Goodwin ex senior director of The Royal Bank of Scotland should lose his pension. He hasn’t done well for his company and should suffer the consequences. Should the senior director for any company not be held responsible? Letting him get away with such a big pension is ludicrous.